[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-473) Support binary search within RFile blocks

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-473) Support binary search within RFile blocks

JIRA jira@apache.org

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13404607#comment-13404607 ]

Adam Fuchs commented on ACCUMULO-473:

To throw out a competing idea, what if we were to build a reverse skip list online as we serialize the block the first time? Then we could support binary search in the block and even scan backwards relatively efficiently. I'm not exactly sure how to quickly evaluate the relative key encoding, but maybe we can resolve those pointers as we pull the block into the block cache.

There would be a small amount of extra storage required, but we could bound this to as small as we want using grouping and encoding techniques. Write speed shouldn't be impacted much, and there would be no extra complexity in caching/managing the blocks for query.

> Support binary search within RFile blocks
> -----------------------------------------
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-473
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-473
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: tserver
>            Reporter: Keith Turner
>            Assignee: Keith Turner
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
> RFiles store blocks of key values using relative encoding.  By default these blocks are small (100k).  To find a key in an RFile the index is used to find the block, then the block is scanned for the key.  It would be nice for iterators that do alot of seeking if a binary search were done instead of a scan.  
> Relative encoding is a form of compression that serializes a key relative to the last key.  For example if the row in a key is the same as the previous key, then the row is not stored again.  This works well with sorted data.   The current on disk format does not support random access within a block, because to read entry N all previous entries must be read.   One option would be to deserialize the block into a form that supports random access and then do binary search.  However this will consume memory and CPU.  If the relative encoding format could be modified to support random access, then binary search could be supported in a memory and CPU efficient way.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira